| |
![]() |
During the anticipated Mar 23 planet lineup clearly a Doctored Mars was inserted in a
number of photos. From Pensacola, FL, a clear paste at Mars location, per a
professional analysis Note the Pixels in the blow up insert. The Words, Mars, and the
Pleiades are all showing larger pixels indicating a type of altering. Perhaps a paste.
From Cascade, CO, pasted large stars over air brushed cloud cover, and pixel
differences at the Mars location. This photo is more clever. I adjusted the full contrast
and brightness to bring our the photo art aspects. It is my opinion that the star
background is genuine but the large stars, clouds and foreground are all layered on top.
It makes the photo more authentic looking but is the reverse of a small cut an paste. In
stead it is large art cut and paste. If you look closely at the cloud features by enlarging
the area you will see large rectangular areas of apparent art brushing. For some odd
reason, 3 of 6 photos provided by the NASA site showing Mars were from the
Netherlands, and these were obviously done by professionals. Pixels are uniform with
no apparent cut and paste etc. I have adjusted the brightness and contract to bring out
an interesting feature, not in the sky but instead on the foreground. The horizon of a
citiscape is a straight line like it is cut and paste in. If that is so then the photo has been
altered in some way with a fake location. And Mars has been placed in a Crowded star field, to confuse the issue. [Note: the halted Orbit of
Earth has put Mars well behind the Earth, not where expected.]
Signs of the Times #733 Mars has moved along rapidly in its orbit, while Earth stalled, and Mars thus rises too late, as it did for the Conjunction on Feb 25. This has been noted during Observations, and because of this focus, a keen eye noted on Mar 23 that a photo on SpaceWeather.COM for that date included Mars and did a Close Check. SpaceWeather.COM says, of this photo received from Quebec. Click on these links for the Small and Large versions, untouched as copied from NASA's SpaceWeather web site. The cut and paste is not obvious, unless contrast is adjusted to bring this forth. [Note: this is a NASA affiliated site, are we surprised?]