Following the May 26-28 Global Quakes, there was an odd Dead Calm on May 30-31. It is unlikely that there would be no quakes, anywhere after such a series of shakeups affecting the entire globe, simultaneously.
May 26 Albuquerque, NM May 30 Albuquerque, NM
Global Quakes gradually made a modest reappearance on June 1-2, registering on June 3-4, but on June 5 dropping again into a Dead Calm, again, affecting the entire globe after the entire globe had participated in Global Quakes. Unlikely.
June 4 Albuquerque, NM June 5 Albuquerque, NM
By June 7 strong Global Quakes had resumed, but then seemed to regularly diminish until June 12 as though global aftershocks had occurred. Unlikely.
June 7 Albuquerque, NM June 12 Albuquerque, NM
On Jun 15-16 strong Global Quakes again turned the charts black, but during June 17-19, oddly calm, astonishingly few aftershocks, globally. Unlikely.
June 15 Albuquerque, NM June 19 Waverly, TN
On June 20 a dual Global Quake occurred, with a quick return to odd global quiet during June 21-22, a global lack of aftershocks! Unlikely
June 20 Albuquerque, NM June 21 Harvard, MA
On June 23 another strong Global Quake occurred, again a quick return to global quiet the next few days, June 24, no aftershocks anywhere, with a gradual buildup to moderate Global Quakes between July 25-July2 and the emergence of multiple Global Quakes per day at key Atlantic Rift placement points. Again, unlikely that aftershocks would be devoid, globally, after such a strong global quake.
June 23 Albuquerque, NM June 24 Waverly, TN
On June 23 it was noted that the seismic monitors, worldwide, had simultaneiously been dialed down, to Dupe the public, so that a quake 50 times the strength would be required to register the same spike as formerly. Nevertheless, by July 3 a distinct Daily4Roll pattern had emerged, running for several days, but by July 5 suddenly dropped into a dead calm. Unlikely.
July 3 Albuquerque, NM July 5 Albuquerque, NM
This begs the question, how many times were the monitors dialed down, with Richter reduced in the databases as had been the mode over the past couple years, so that the public would not be alarmed at the increased?